Ask Biz

Ask Biz

    Subscribe to Bizniti

      Newsletter

      Bizfirst Logo

      BizNiti

      Legal and tax Counseling WordWide

      MUMBAI

      SILICON VALLEY

      MUMBAI

      BANGLORE

      SINGAPORE

      MUMBAI BKC

      NEW DELHI

      MUNICH

      NEW YORK

      Tax Hotline

      September 18, 2020

      Madras High Court holds - Business Transfer for Non-Monetary Consideration does not qualify as Slump Sale
      -Madras High Court holds that monetary consideration is necessary for a transaction to qualify as a ‘sale’, and consequently for a transaction to be a ‘slump sale’.
      -Holds that mere use of the expression ‘consideration for transfer’ in the scheme of arrangement does not make the transaction a ‘sale’.
      -Holds that transfer of assets on amalgamation takes place by operation of law – by force of a court’s order - and ceases to be a contractual or consensual transfer.
      -Holds that there is no estoppel under Indian tax law, and an alternate plea can be raised if it is a question of law, even if the plea is mutually contradictory to an earlier plea
      In a recent decision,1the Madras High Court (“Madras HC”) held that a transfer of business in lieu of issuance of shares by the transferee company as consideration does not amount to a ‘sale’ and accordingly, cannot be considered a ‘slump sale’ under the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“ITA”).

      Background

      Areva T&D India Limited (“Assessee”) had transferred its non-transmission and distribution business on a going-concern basis to its subsidiary Alstom Industrial Products Limited (“AIPL” or “Transferee”), pursuant to a scheme of arrangement sanctioned by the Calcutta High Court under the Companies Act, 1956 (“Transaction”). The Assessee received INR 413 million in the form of fully paid up equity shares of AIPL as consideration for the Transaction basis valuation undertaken by an independent valuer. The Assessee filed its income-tax return computing capital gains by characterizing the Transaction as a slump sale and did not pay capital gains tax since the entire capital gains were to be invested in tax saving bonds notified under section 54EC of the ITA. However, on account of an amendment in section 54EC,2during the assessment proceedings the Assessee raised an alternate argument without prejudice before the assessing officer (“AO”) that the Transaction should not be subject to capital gains tax relying on the decision of the Mumbai Tribunal in case of Avaya Global Connect Limited v. ACIT.3 The AO disregarded the claim of the Assessee stating that the Assessee had itself agreed that the Transaction qualified as a slump sale and did not raise such a claim at the time of filing the original or revised return. On appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (“CIT (A)”) upheld that AO’s order, holding that the Assessee was estopped from raising the alternate plea that the Transaction was not a transfer by way of slump sale. On second appeal as well, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“Tribunal”) upheld the order of CIT(A) and opined that the Transaction was a transfer by way of slump sale as claimed by the Assessee themselves. Before the Madras HC, the fundamental question to be considered was whether the transfer of business of the Assessee in exchange of issuance of shares of AIPL qualifies as ‘slump sale’ under section 50B of the ITA.
      Ruling by Madras HC

      •On the question of maintainability of the Assessee’s alternate plea
      – i.e. the Transaction was not a slump sale – the Madras HC relied on the Delhi High Court’s decision in CIT v.Bharat General Reinsurance Co. Ltd.,4 and held that there is no estoppel under Indian tax law and an alternate plea can be raised even if the plea is mutually contradictory to the earlier plea as it is question of law.
      •On the merits, the Madras HC made some important observations:
      - Acknowledging that the term ‘sale’ is not defined under the ITA, the Madras HC considered the definition of ‘sale’ under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (“TOPA”). It noted that the TOPA defines ‘sale’ to mean a transfer of ownership in exchange for a price paid or promised or part paid and part promised.
      -It also noted that the term ‘price’ is not defined under the ITA or TOPA, and relied on the definition of ‘price’ under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 (“SOGA”)5being money consideration for a sale of goods.
      -On the basis of the definition of ‘sale’ under the TOPA and ‘price’ under the SOGA, the Madras HC concluded that in order for the Transaction to qualify as ‘slump sale’, the sale should be by way of transfer of ownership in exchange of a price paid or promised or part paid and part promised and the price should be a money consideration. It held that if there is no monetary consideration involved, then the Transaction could not be brought within the ambit of a ‘slump sale’ under the ITA. • The Madras HC also relied on the Bombay High Court’s decision in CIT v.Bharat Bijlee Limited,6wherein the Bombay High Court held that transfer of a business undertaking as a going concern against issuance of bonds or preference shares was not a sale, but an exchange. Accordingly, the Bombay High Court held that section 50B of the ITA relating to computation of capital gains in case of a slump sale was not applicable to such a transfer. •Regarding the reliance placed by the Revenue on the decision of the Delhi High Court in SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd. v. ITSC7, the Madras HC specifically noted that the Bombay High Court had distinguished the Delhi High Court decision on the basis that the consideration for transfer in that case was both in the form of cash and shares and thus there was some monetary consideration, which was not the case of the Assessee. •Lastly, the Madras HC also considered the effect of approval of the scheme of arrangement by the High Court of Calcutta and held that when an amalgamation takes place, the transfer of assets takes place by operation of law and it ceases to be a contractual or a consensual transfer. On this basis and relying on the decision of Supreme Court in case of State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkerley & Co.,8the Court held that a transfer pursuant to approval of a scheme of arrangement, is not a contractual transfer, but a statutorily approved transfer and cannot be brought within the definition of the word ‘sale’. Accordingly, such transfer cannot be construed as a ‘slump sale’ under the ITA.

      Analysis

      While the Madras HC has held that the Transaction does not qualify as a ‘slump sale’, the decision is silent on the manner of computation of capital gains. Prior to the insertion of section 50B, there was no machinery provision for computing the cost of acquisition (“COA”) on transfer of business undertakings as going concerns. The Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in CIT v.B.C. Srinivasa Setty,9held that the charging provisions and the computation mechanism together formed an integrated code and that if the COA is unascertainable, then no capital gains tax liability could arise. The Supreme Court re-iterated this principle in PNB Finance Ltd. v. CIT.10It is unclear in this case what the implication of the Transaction not qualifying as a ‘slump sale’ would be

      – Ipsita Agarwalla & Varsha Bhattacharya

      You can direct your queries or comments to the authors

      1 Areva T&D India Ltd. v. CIT, Tax Case Appeal No. 673 of 2018, decision dated 08.09.2020
      2 The Finance Act, 2007 inserted a proviso to section 54EC limiting the investment in long-term specified asset during a financial year to INR 5 million
      3 [2008] 26 SOT 397 (Mumbai), The Mumbai Tribunal held that a transfer resulting from a scheme of amalgamation duly approved by the court, could not be regarded as a ‘sale’ of an undertaking, and consequently could not be a slump sale.
      4 (1971) 81 ITR 303
      5 Section 2(10), SOGA
      6 (2014) 365 ITR 258
      7 [2012] 251 CTR 129 (Delhi), The Delhi High Court had held that on transfer of business in exchange of another asset, there is indeed a monetary consideration which is being discharged in the form of shares. It would not be appropriate to construe and regard the word ‘slump sale’ to mean that it applies to ‘sale’ in a narrow sense and as an antithesis to the word ‘transfer’ as used in Section 2(47) of ITA
      8 1959 SCR 379
      9 AIR 1981 SC 972
      10 (2008) 307 ITR 75 (SC)
      11 ITA No. 822/2005, decision dated 07.08.2020
      12 [1989] 177 ITR 198 (SC)
      13 [2001] 248 ITR 323 (SC)

      Benchmark Litigation Asia-Pacific:Tier 1 for Government & Regulatory and Tax 2020, 2019, 2018

      Legal500 Asia-Pacific:Tier 1 for Tax, Investment Funds, Labour & Employment and TMT 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012

      Chambers and Partners Asia-Pacific: Band 1 for Employment, Lifesciences, Tax and TMT 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015

      IFLR1000:Tier 1 for Private Equity and Project Development: Telecommunications Networks. 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2014

      AsiaLaw Asia-Pacific Guide 2020:Ranked ‘Outstanding’ for TMT, Labour & Employment, Private Equity, Regulatory and Tax

      FT Innovative Lawyers Asia Pacific 2019 Awards: NDA ranked 2nd in the Most Innovative Law Firm category (Asia-Pacific Headquartered)

      RSG-Financial Times: India’s Most Innovative Law Firm 2019, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 Who’s Who Legal 2019: Nishith Desai, Corporate Tax and Private Funds – Thought Leader Vikram Shroff, HR and Employment Law- Global Thought Leader Vaibhav Parikh, Data Practices - Thought Leader (India) Dr. Milind Antani, Pharma & Healthcare – only Indian Lawyer to be recognized for ‘Life sciences - Regulatory,’ for 5 years consecutively

      Merger Market 2018:Fastest growing M&A Law Firm in India

      DISCLAIMER

      The contents of this hotline should not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed disclaimer.

      This Hotline provides general information existing at the time of preparation. The Hotline is intended as a news update and Nishith Desai Associates neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this Hotline. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on the specific facts and circumstances. This Hotline does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncements.

      This is not a Spam mail. You have received this mail because you have either requested for it or someone must have suggested your name. Since India has no anti-spamming law, we refer to the US directive, which states that a mail cannot be considered Spam if it contains the sender's contact information, which this mail does. In case this mail doesn't concern you, please unsubscribe from mailing list.

      Proud Moments

      Benchmark Litigation Asia-Pacific:Tier 1 for Government & Regulatory and Tax 2020, 2019, 2018

      Legal500 Asia-Pacific:Tier 1 for Tax, Investment Funds, Labour & Employment and TMT 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012

      Chambers and Partners Asia Pacific:Band 1 for Employment, Lifesciences, Tax and TMT 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015

      IFLR1000:Tier 1 for Private Equity and Project Development: Telecommunications Networks. 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2014

      AsiaLaw Asia-Pacific Guide 2020:Tier 1 (Outstanding) for TMT, Labour & Employment, Private Equity, Regulatory and Tax

      FT Innovative Lawyers Asia Pacific 2019 Awards:NDA ranked 2nd in the Most Innovative Law Firm category (Asia-Pacific Headquartered)

      RSG-Financial Times:India’s Most Innovative Law Firm 2019, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014

      Research Papers

      Research Papers

      Audio

      Connect with us at events, conferences and seminars.

      NDA Hotline

      Video

      Add Link here

      Add Link here

      Add Link here

      Mobile App

      Click here for

      Apple IOS

      Android

      Want to work with us?

      Inviting Top Talent for our Corporate Law, Infrastructure, IP and International Tax Practices

      Strong credentials in Corporate Law (in particular M&A or Fund Investment), Infrastructure, IP or International Tax? Now’s the time to apply. We’re looking for the industry's best talent with scope to do extraordinary work for the world’s best, marquee clients. Reach out for a great career in a great place!

      To learn more about us Click here.

      Bizfirstpro TV

      March 05, 2020

      Webinar: Re-thinking Indian Private Equity Exits

      You are receiving this email because of your relationship with the sender.

      To safely unsubscribe or modify your subscription settings please click here